| | |
|
|
| RSCD vid#1 (classic daemon)Thu, 08 Jan 2009 08:14:03 -0800 by lanboy666Runescape Classic Daemon (www.zzgame.info, sign up there!)irc.freenode. net #zzgameThis is a vid of me multitasking with no problems playing on two accounts simultaneously on zZGame's server. Take that you autoers!Keep on mind that autoing is NOT tolerated, as there are active mods who are constantly checking up on players. Don't even think about it! Related: rs runescape "runescape classic" rscd zzgame daemon | |
|
|
| | |
|
|
| | |
|
|
| 2007 SUBARU FORESTER 2.5X AWD Sport Automatic Green Thu, 08 Jan 2009 07:57:31 -0800 by ANAUTOCONNECTIONA N AutoConnection is pleased to offer thistwo thousand and seven Subaru Forester two point five x for auction on eBay. This Subaru All Wheel Drive is the best kept secret in the Import Market. The back seat can fit a baby seat with ease. The next buyer will get a three day one hundred fifty mile buy back guarantee with their purchase. So drive with piece of mind. Only one other person had the privilege of owning this great vehicle. When the owner traded this vehicle in, he stated that the mileage was accurate. Vehicles with no defects like this one are hard to find. Vehicle has never been smoked in. No signs of collision damage are evident on this vehicle. There is no bodywork present on this vehicle. Not only are there no door dings on this vehicle, it will roll out of our showroom detailed, looking and smelling new. It appears that the owner has always stored this vehicle inside and given it the extra attention that a magnificent vehicle like this deserves. When you feel the transmission shift on this vehicle, you would think it was a brand new auto. There is a properly functioning engine in this vehicle. All electric and power equipment work like new. A N AutoConnection, the choice of thousands worldwide. Related: 2007 800-652-4032 awd forester h4 subaru | |
|
|
| | |
|
|
| | |
|
|
| Shrine hand washingThu, 08 Jan 2009 07:49:02 -0800 by jclemyIt's a sign of respect to wash your hands before entering the main shrine area. You actually even wash your mouth out which was kind of cool. The water always seemed to taste delicious! Related: tokyo "meiji jingu" 2008 | |
|
|
| | |
|
|
| | |
|
|
| | |
|
|
| | |
|
|
| | |
|
|
| | |
|
|
| Le concert impromptu with Bussoni plays: Frank ZappaThu, 08 Jan 2009 07:16:27 -0800 by GreggaryPeccaryListening to Zappa's music, one is immediately struck by the profusion of musical references, and the lushness of sound and music in which audiences, critics, even musicians, have looked for their own references, most of the time in vain. The ruling order cannot tolerate the confusion of genres. The first and foremost characteristic of Zappa's music is the will to submit any musical code whatsoever to the power of his imagination. Music that is purely linear, even though it may sometimes get very close to the very core of expression, could never reach the same level of relevance as Zappa's music from the edge. Zappa is a demiurge, an authentic creative artist. No one else could manage such interweaving of the abstract and the concrete in music. His 'discourse music' shattered the dominant musical discourse. He dared cross the limits and succeeded in doing so. Where others burst the music system, often giving rise to meteorites in the process, Zappa had it implode. He undermined it, "bugging" the musical codes, sowing his perturbational genes into that DNA chain of sound codification is leading to. He has definitely freed 20th century music from its fetters and opened it to infinite space. He embodies the ultimate resistance to formalistic refundancy and tautology. At a time where music had become a mere code of signs, a scion of language, he gave it its occult liberating power back."You'll be absolutely free Only if you want to be"...Yves Charpentier, fluteAnne Chamussy, oboeJean-Christophe Murer, clarinetDidier Velty, hornChristoph Tessier, bassoon Related: frank zappa composer 20th century impromptu woodwind quintet bussoni twenty small cigars strictly genteel woodwinds | |
|
|
| exhibiting machines + functioning machinesThu, 08 Jan 2009 07:15:50 -0800 by mruvruThe aim of this study is to discuss the machine in current art as a proposition for upcoming art. The machine in the age of computers and internet is the information machine. Before, heavy and monstruous, it now comes closer to the human being and becomes an idea, an abstraction, diagrams and numbers, a problem or poetry. This way we exhibit questioning and thoughts about the machine in art and make them function. The shape technology presents is work of the internal logic of techniques, but it can also be result of the artists imagination. Technology as an issue, object or idea is, to art, more important than its products. The artist, besides reflecting in his art what exists in the world, has the capacity to act in the world. The value of technological work of art doesnt reside in technology itself, but in the creative movements of art on technology. Thus, there is no superiority of an art that uses technology, regardless of its degree, over another that doesnt use it, even considering two existing discourses in present art which are opposite to a certain degree: the discourse of the so-called contemporary art that feels the absence of poetry or content in technological artwork, and that of technological art, which is put at a superior level in comparison to traditional art. Theres no artistic progress and theres no evolution of styles according to technological progress: in art theres no progress or regress, but creation, complexity, transformation and openness. In the same way that for the avant-garde art notions such as beauty, history and origin already didnt carry so much importance, current art is made from acceleration, accumulation and oblivion of works and artists, within increasing interconnectivity, presentification, saturation and complexity. The confusion about certain productions being or not art or something else daily life, science, politics, technology leads us to an issue: is there a limit or shouldnt there be an importance in the limit between two things when they are connected? Thats the reason why the concept of object has a wider meaning, as it is machine, sign, technical object and poetic image, always in state of connection. And consistent art, or a poetical project that is in accordance with our epoch, must be research: aesthetic and scientific. Related: "avant-garde movements" "machine aesthetics" "functioning aesthetics" "current art" "technological art" "contemporary art" object | |
|
|
| exhibiting machines + functioning machinesThu, 08 Jan 2009 07:10:20 -0800 by mruvruThe aim of this study is to discuss the machine in current art as a proposition for upcoming art. The machine in the age of computers and internet is the information machine. Before, heavy and monstruous, it now comes closer to the human being and becomes an idea, an abstraction, diagrams and numbers, a problem or poetry. This way we exhibit questioning and thoughts about the machine in art and make them function. The shape technology presents is work of the internal logic of techniques, but it can also be result of the artists imagination. Technology as an issue, object or idea is, to art, more important than its products. The artist, besides reflecting in his art what exists in the world, has the capacity to act in the world. The value of technological work of art doesnt reside in technology itself, but in the creative movements of art on technology. Thus, there is no superiority of an art that uses technology, regardless of its degree, over another that doesnt use it, even considering two existing discourses in present art which are opposite to a certain degree: the discourse of the so-called contemporary art that feels the absence of poetry or content in technological artwork, and that of technological art, which is put at a superior level in comparison to traditional art. Theres no artistic progress and theres no evolution of styles according to technological progress: in art theres no progress or regress, but creation, complexity, transformation and openness. In the same way that for the avant-garde art notions such as beauty, history and origin already didnt carry so much importance, current art is made from acceleration, accumulation and oblivion of works and artists, within increasing interconnectivity, presentification, saturation and complexity. The confusion about certain productions being or not art or something else daily life, science, politics, technology leads us to an issue: is there a limit or shouldnt there be an importance in the limit between two things when they are connected? Thats the reason why the concept of object has a wider meaning, as it is machine, sign, technical object and poetic image, always in state of connection. And consistent art, or a poetical project that is in accordance with our epoch, must be research: aesthetic and scientific. Related: "avant-garde movements" "machine aesthetics" "functioning aesthetics" "current art" "technological art" "contemporary art" object | |
|
|
| | |
|
|
| exhibiting machines + functioning machinesThu, 08 Jan 2009 07:08:12 -0800 by mruvruThe aim of this study is to discuss the machine in current art as a proposition for upcoming art. The machine in the age of computers and internet is the information machine. Before, heavy and monstruous, it now comes closer to the human being and becomes an idea, an abstraction, diagrams and numbers, a problem or poetry. This way we exhibit questioning and thoughts about the machine in art and make them function. The shape technology presents is work of the internal logic of techniques, but it can also be result of the artists imagination. Technology as an issue, object or idea is, to art, more important than its products. The artist, besides reflecting in his art what exists in the world, has the capacity to act in the world. The value of technological work of art doesnt reside in technology itself, but in the creative movements of art on technology. Thus, there is no superiority of an art that uses technology, regardless of its degree, over another that doesnt use it, even considering two existing discourses in present art which are opposite to a certain degree: the discourse of the so-called contemporary art that feels the absence of poetry or content in technological artwork, and that of technological art, which is put at a superior level in comparison to traditional art. Theres no artistic progress and theres no evolution of styles according to technological progress: in art theres no progress or regress, but creation, complexity, transformation and openness. In the same way that for the avant-garde art notions such as beauty, history and origin already didnt carry so much importance, current art is made from acceleration, accumulation and oblivion of works and artists, within increasing interconnectivity, presentification, saturation and complexity. The confusion about certain productions being or not art or something else daily life, science, politics, technology leads us to an issue: is there a limit or shouldnt there be an importance in the limit between two things when they are connected? Thats the reason why the concept of object has a wider meaning, as it is machine, sign, technical object and poetic image, always in state of connection. And consistent art, or a poetical project that is in accordance with our epoch, must be research: aesthetic and scientific. Related: "avant-garde movements" "machine aesthetics" "functioning aesthetics" "current art" "technological art" "contemporary art" object | |
|
|
| | |
|
| |
